Standing by Citi Bike

June 18, 2013
The Citi brand makes the bike share possible, but it’s a true service, not just a marketing campaign.
Julie Doughty
Senior Manager, Naming and Writing,
based in Landor New York

How did Citi’s latest sponsorship capture—and retain—so much loyalty?

Citi Bike is New York’s two-week-old bike sharing program sponsored by Citi. It’s having some growing pains, but I’m still an avid fan. Why am I—and so many other New Yorkers—willing to suspend judgment? 

I signed up for Citi Bike a month before it launched and eagerly showed off my little blue key. I rode one of the new bikes to work the first day I could, and I enjoyed it when strangers on the street shouted out to ask how I liked the bike share. Now, when I see those neat rows of simple blue bikes on a city street, I smile and wonder—is New York becoming a more optimistic, convenient, European, neighborly place?  



Citi Bike

The fantasy hit a stumbling block when I couldn’t return my bike to the docking station one morning. The helpline was busy. The app was frozen. But the other diehards around me remained positive: “No problem!” “We’ll just go over to 5th Ave and 13th.” “Give ‘em time!” 



But the other station was broken, and so were the next two I found. Finally, I got the bike returned to a distant dock and went into work late. Stubbornly, I repeated the process the next day, refusing to accept that there were problems. And yet, I still love Citi Bike and feel rather thankful when I pass a Citibank—I’m glad they are trying to get this off the ground.



Why hasn’t the disgruntled, skeptical New Yorker in me rushed to judgment yet? There are several reasons:



1. It fills a clear need.

The aim is simple: bring a bike share program to New York. It’s a dream many people share, and Citi Bike brings that dream to life in a straightforward way by making the bikes plentiful and as easy to use as possible. The Citi branding is what makes the program possible, but it’s a true service and not just a marketing campaign.



2. It uses strong visual branding.

Those bikes look great. Citi blue is striking on the city streets, and it’s done in a thoughtful way that serves instead of shouts. For example, the panel that carries the Citi logo also prevents my skirt from getting caught in the spokes. I feel taken care of, not just marketed to.



3. Its verbal branding is consistent.

There’s a simple, memorable name. The tone of the membership kit, the prelaunch email, and the on-bike messages is simple, direct, and optimistic. Even the customer service message I received after the docking problem had the same tone. All of these moving parts work together like the gears of a bike to move the brand forward. There is a sense of order and of reassuranc that comes from the smoothness of how the system aims to communicate simplicity and optimism. If their messages are this clear, surely Citi Bike can get a few docking stations back online—and meet whatever challenges they hit next.

Citi’s vision for this sponsorship is equally clear—they’re all about supporting their customers’ lifestyles. Their ads have shown us people pursuing their passions, whether that’s scuba diving, remodeling their kitchens, falling in love with a pair of shoes, or climbing a dramatic rock formation. The ad for the new Citi Simplicity® card features a woman focusing on her boxing class, instead of worrying about late fees. Citi also sponsored the London Olympics and the Mets’ Citi Field. In Citi Bike, they’ve found yet another way to support a lifestyle choice, and this time it benefits my daily commute. It makes perfect sense that they would do this, and that they would be determined to see it through.

With all of that coordinated effort, is it any wonder they’ve gotten so many to believe in their latest initiative, and accept a few bumps in the road?

Image of Citi Bike courtesy of Shinya Suzuki/flickr.

Category: Brand purpose & sustainability
When designing packaging, think of how it can help deliver the product.
J. Scott Hosa
Associate Director of Graphic Technology,
based in Landor Cincinnati

It has become increasingly difficult to differentiate your product from those of your competitors. One method to encourage consumers to select your brand over others is to use a package that helps deliver the product. Although gimmicks abound (vortex bottles and punch-top cans help drinks flow right out), there are viable solutions that provide inspiration.

The Fage sidecar yogurt tub is not only an attractive package decorated with high-quality, in-mold labeling, but it also employs a hinged cup with honey or fruit dispensed by tipping the articulated package to pour the sweet treat into the yogurt. This elegant solution allows simple preparation and a distinct consumer experience not achieved in conventional yogurt packaging.

Fage

Sta-Bil’s multi-chamber, high-density polyethylene bottle is another example of packaging that simplifies the use of the product it contains; in this case, precision measurement for dispensing the fuel stabilizer additive. Tilt the bottle before opening to measure the designated amount of liquid into an attached chamber; open this chamber and dispense the exact quantity needed. A standard bottle may use the same amount of resin and have the same footprint, but it does not provide the convenience and accuracy of this unique structural solution.

Think of it this way: Why pop popcorn in a bag and then pour it into a bowl or struggle with an awkward bag when you can pop it right in the bowl?

So, if you are planning a packaging update, consider how the user interacts with the product. Are there opportunities to make the consumer’s life easier? Can your package simplify or improve the product experience? If you’re creating a tube for a skin conditioner, would a massaging cap be beneficial? What if your birdseed container can be easily converted into a feeder?

Napoleon once said, “If you wish to be a success in the world, promise everything, deliver nothing.” Instead, if you wish to be a success in the packaging world, it helps to actually deliver something.

First published on packagePRINTING.com.

Image of Fage yogurt courtesy of Mindy Hertzton/flickr.

Category: Packaging design
For tips and tricks for handling a merger, don’t turn to Mad Men.
Elyse Kazarinoff
Creative Director, Verbal Branding,
based in Landor New York

Spoiler Alert: This article covers key moments of past episodes in Mad Men season six, including last week’s episode 11, “Favors.”

With all of the shocking moments we were treated to in last Sunday night’s Mad Men episode, one that captured my attention as a branding expert was the deal Don makes with Ted. In exchange for Ted securing an Air National Guard spot for Sylvia’s son, Don agrees to finally stop the internal battle he has been waging with Ted ever since the merger of SCDP and CGC. If their bargain sticks, this could be good news for the freshly merged agency, because thus far they have been the poster children for “what not to do” to engage and align management and employees in a merger.

Mad Men2

Here are some best practice principles that Don, Ted, and company fail to take into account as they rush headlong into combining their two agencies:

Have clear goals and objectives.

From the very start, the decision to merge is an impulsive act of desperation. It is made the night before the Chevy pitch when Don and Ted suddenly realize that they can never hope to compete with the big agencies. There are no clear goals or objectives for the merger other than the immediate need to join forces to win. It’s clear that they are thrilled with the prestigious new Chevy account, but they may also be left thinking, “Now what?”

Know who you want to be and what you will stand for.

When Don and Ted spring the good news on Peggy after they win the Chevy account, they ask her to write a press release announcing the merger. When she asks what the name should be, Don tells her to describe the company that she would want to work for. As we know, failing to make the decision about the name right away causes a lot of confusion and questions externally, and makes it hard for employees to explain. When Jim Cutler gets the letter addressed to Sterling, Gleason and Pryce, he warns that if the new agency doesn’t find a name for itself, others will do it for them. Although Ted sends out a memo explaining that all seven initials should be used when answering the company phone, nothing other than that announcement and Peggy’s press release seems to be communicated to the employees. Letting others define you—whether it is your copy chief or a random letter writer—is not a strategic way to communicate your company’s image to the world.

Leadership must be aligned and committed to ensure success.

Before the Chevy pitch Jim Cutler tells Don and Ted, “I want to make this clear—unless this works, I'm against it.” Sterling agrees with him. From what we see, that is the extent of upper management’s alignment with the plan. Tentative at best, hostile at worst. Although they are all committed to winning the Chevy account by merging teams, Jim’s comment foreshadows the lack of clarity about roles, responsibilities, mission, vision, and strategy that leaves employees uncertain, confused, and downright paranoid when the teams actually come together on moving day to SCDP’s offices in the TimeLife Building.

Communicate the rationale, vision, and strategy for the merger to all levels and functions.

On moving day, Joan takes command by directing creatives and executives to their new offices or workspaces.  There is no explanation about why the creatives are all put into one large room, beyond a veiled threat that that seating assignments could change (a subtle suggestion of the layoffs that come later). When Ted’s secretary demands to see the list, Joan doesn’t want to give it to her at first, in an obvious power play. That day is full of doubt, worry, and is the beginning of a series of firings. The communication breakdown is even more obvious when the partners go after each other for hiding information about lost accounts and a dying partner from each another. So although the merger is rushed and redundancies are a stark reality of mergers, the information that both the SC&P partners and employees receive consists of omissions, innuendos, and mixed messages instead of straightforward dialogue and well-thought-out announcements.

Create a team to support—find key influencers and engage them early.

Unfortunately, at SC&P it has become every man (or woman) for him or herself rather than a team effort. Without a direction and a vision for the company, there are no fans of the merger in the ranks. Don and Ted are at each other’s throats. Pete continues to worry about being marginalized. Ken is almost killed in an accident with Chevy execs and the partners barely notice that he is injured. Jim is looking for any opportunity to cut more former SCDP employees, like Bob Benson and Ginsberg, from the staff. Joan goes rogue to pursue the Avon account. Ted appoints Pete head of new business in a spur-of-the-moment decision. And word on the street, according to Duck Phillips, is that SC&P has “a lot of chiefs and very few Indians.”

With everyone either running for cover or taking an “us versus them” attitude, there is no team spirit.  There is as much dissension at SC&P as there is in the society of 1968. Only Jim Cutler tries some teambuilding when he misguidedly brings in a quack doctor to administer speed-laced “vitamin shots” to the team working the weekend on the Chevy account. But he may redeem himself a bit in last Sunday’s episode by reminding Ted that “it’s all our juice” in response to his sparring with Don over whose juice (Sunkist for Team Don or Ocean Spray for Team Ted) should be the next potential new client. However, I don’t think we can expect any positive team building exercises to be part of the upcoming episodes!

So if you are planning a merger, Mad Men is not the place to go for helpful tips and tricks.

Image of Mad Men , season six, episode 11, courtesy of Jaimie Trueblood/amc.

Category: Internal branding
Are BlackBerry’s new name, new operating system, and new range of products enough to save the company?
Lulu Raghavan
Managing Director,
based in Landor Mumbai

A brand is more than a name. It is a set of associations with products or services that get built up in the mind of the customer over a period of time. These associations imbue the name with meaning. Strong brands are not built on great names but on differentiated and relevant brand experiences that they deliver to all their stakeholders. Therefore, a name change cannot save a brand. Neither can it shield it from a tarnished image, especially if the product or service fails to live up to customer expectations.

Let’s take the recent case of Research in Motion (RIM) changing its corporate name to BlackBerry, the name of its once trailblazing mobile devices that have, in recent years, lost out to Apple’s iPhone and Samsung’s Galaxy series of smartphones. Is the name change going to help the struggling company? Unlikely, unless a superior product experience supports the name change. An inferior BlackBerry product will translate to an inferior BlackBerry masterbrand and no amount of marketing support can save that situation.

However, the renaming of RIM to BlackBerry makes strategic sense because it will help create simplicity, efficiency, and internal passion for the organisation. All of these are important elements of the overall business transformation journey that the company has embarked on:

  • Simplicity: Acronym names are a hit or a miss. For IBM and HP, it works because of the stories behind the names. But RIM? The corporate name is neither recognised nor understood globally except perhaps in the US and bu a select group of Wall Street analysts. Research In Motion is not a simple name either. Moving to BlackBerry allows the company to simplify its corporate name and leverage the recognisability and likeability of the brand across a wider audience, including employees and investors. BlackBerry is not the first company to elevate its product brand. Other well-known examples include Sara Lee, Hanes, FedEx, Colgate-Palmolive, and Danone. All of them used successful product brand names to create strong corporate identities.
  • Efficiency: BlackBerry has now moved from a “house of brands” to a “branded house.” It will no longer launch sub-brands like Bold, Curve, Torch, or PlayBook. All future products will have alphanumeric names like the BlackBerry Z10. This approach allows all resources to be dedicated to the building of just one master brand—BlackBerry. It helps to create focus on brand building and marketing efforts, and is certainly less expensive than supporting multiple sub-brands. Carly Fiona, former CEO of HP, famously got rid of hundreds of sub-brands and put all the focus on the HP master brand (before the Compaq acquisition).
  • Internal passion: For BlackBerry’s turnaround efforts to be successful, it must inspire and motivate its employees to deliver the promise of the brand. In this regard, it is more fun to say,“I work for BlackBerry,” than “I work for RIM.” This name change might just create a lot more passion and pride for the company among its employees.

Success rides on product launches. What is amply clear is that it will take much more than the name change for the company to revive its fortunes. Currently, it looks like the recent product launch is going to either make or break BlackBerry as a company. The BlackBerry Z10 smartphone must strongly connect with consumers in the fiercely competitive consumer technology market. It should provide loyal users a compelling reason to stay with BlackBerry and nonusers a compelling reason to switch from an Apple, Samsung, or HTC device.

The Blackberry Z10 will need to become the new reflection of everything that Blackberry stands for—much like Lumia has done for Nokia—to drive a reappraisal of a brand that has lost its leadership credentials but may yet turn things around.

With the name change, what the company has done is to boldly bet its fortunes on its product line up. It is definitely risky to put all its eggs in one basket by moving to a branded house, but is there any other way out for BlackBerry? If the BlackBerry Z10 and future products can manage the difficult task of connecting with consumers, the name change will clearly be successful. When the BlackBerry range become desirable devices, there will be increased awareness and a halo effect on the entire company.

First published on Business-Standard.com.

Category: Brand strategy & positioning
As brand stakeholders, we have an obligation to ensure consistency in our color palette.
J. Scott Hosa
Associate Director of Graphic Technology,
based in Landor Cincinnati

The bullseye on the latest Tide laundry detergent label is “pretty close” to the official Tide Orange. That’s okay, right? The Hershey Brown on the new promo pack is in the general neighborhood of the approved spec. Not a problem.



Think again!



For brand managers, equity colors are sacred. Design directors demand accurate, exact color reproduction— every time! As brand stakeholders, we have an obligation to ensure consistency in our brand palette.



Variant colors are important as well. Shopability depends on sufficient differentiation and consistency of flavor colors. This is not an easy task, especially when our packaging is printed with various print methods on a wide range of substrates decorated many different ways.



Here are a few key factors for maintaining consistent color in this challenging environment and for managing expectations throughout the supply chain:



Establish official color



Old Spice Red is Old Spice Red. It has a name. It has a number. Strict digital protocol dictates the use of the official swatch in our files, built the right way every time. There is no ambiguity when it comes to our target. The designer is confident in its use, the production artist ensures its clear communication, the separator honors its recipe, and the printer confirms its accuracy.



Ink on substrate



The same Coke Red ink offset printed on SBS board looks completely different when printed gravure on clear film backed in white ink.

 Request ink drawdowns pulled on the final packaging material. The printer’s ink supplier will factor in the unique print characteristics and the effect of substrate on color to formulate an ink that matches the brand color under the specific printing and decorating conditions.

The X-rite PantoneLIVE cloud-based ecosystem exploits the “master” and “dependent” relationship between the pure color target and its dependent versions based on how the color prints using different methods on different substrates. The future of color control very well may be sharing the scientific recipe under these specific conditions via digital means. 

In the meantime, ink on substrate is a fast and easy way to manage expectations and allow the printer to prepare the job in advance and thereby ensure success.



Share samples between suppliers



Make sure that different packaging components are not produced in a vacuum. Provide established hero examples to various partners to support the ideal vision.



Print quality management



Communicate the importance of consistent equity color. Hold printers accountable for their results. Evaluate periodic samples to avoid color drift. Develop brand ambassadors throughout the supply chain to own the brand’s color.



Close is not okay!

First published on packagePRINTING.com.


Tide -logo -200

Category: Identity & design
Displaying 1-5 of 206
More results
Choose one:
Share Facebook Twitter Google+LinkedInEmail